Mr Justice Eady said an order would make "little practical difference".
Can News of the World now put child pornography on its website? I mean, there is already so much of that on the internet that it would make "little practical difference".
British privacy laws are shite. All individuals are entitled to privacy until some turd from the tabloid media or the 'respectable' media (if there's such a thing in Britain) gets his grubby little hands on details of anyone's sex life.
There is no reason why it should be so. In most civilised countries it isn't. Cf.:
French sites fined for linking to privacy-invading content (OUT-LAW News, 10/04/2008)
No comments:
Post a Comment